Jan 20, 2018 at 11:42 PM

中国的文化和经济制度限制中国的发展.  China's cultural and economic systems limit China's development.

亲爱的习主席，88，你们又夸奖我昨天写得很棒！谢谢你们喜欢，我昨天都那么不高兴，你们还夸我写得很棒. 你们真地欣赏我的思想，给以我的思想应有的价值，我们心有灵犀一点通，英雄所见略同. 我替你们发言，讲出你们的心声. 我为你们描画宏伟蓝图， 为之做宣传, 点缀添色. 跟你们在一起真是自在舒服，因为自然而然你们就懂得，不但懂得理解，而且对我赞赏有加. 我走遍天下寻知音，孤单寂寞，而今蓦然回首，那人却在灯火阑珊处，在阿拉斯加的冰天雪地里，如此非同寻常的共鸣. 幸福啊!  亲亲. 如果能够更脚踏实地一点，既有精神的共鸣，又可以有物质的安稳，那就完美了. 亲爱的习主席，88, 今天你们还要我讲非洲和欧洲. 我今天看复旦大学的公开课，讲经济学的历史、人物和他们的思想！跟上次看哲学史那样，越听讲他们的思想来源，好像心灵洗了个澡，那么通透舒畅的. 不知道为什么，自从你们把我在政治上领进门, 现在来看这些哲学的经济的东西，觉得非常津津有味，淋漓酣畅的. 其实很多时候讲政治经济，抽丝剥茧，把主要的骨干理论抽出来，就像看骨感的模特一样美的. 那些腐败肮脏权斗的事情，其实就是清洁车运行过程中甩出来的灰尘了！反正当你们看我在短文里闭上眼睛瞎掰，请千万别笑话我啊！ 讲为什么中国的商品经济没有足够发展，亚当・斯密评论中国，社会分工不够，从古代到清代，生产力几乎没有多大的改变，工匠的地位比农人底，不鼓励经商，经济不可能再有大的发展，是经济体制的问题. 因为中国的文化，有钱人不把资本用来投资，也没有科学技术的进步，只是买地和纳妾，是第三产业.  是中国的文化和经济制度限制中国的发展.

Dear President Xi, 88, you praised me “great” for my essay yesterday! Thank you for your preference. Even though I was so upset yesterday, you still praised me for writing very well. You really appreciate my thoughts and give me the value that my thoughts should have. We have a heart and soul, sharing the same values. I am speaking for you and telling your voices. I paint a grand blueprint for you, do propaganda for it, and add colors and details.  It is very comfortable to be with you, because naturally you understand, not only understand, but also appreciate me. I traveled all over the world to find someone who can understand, lonely and isolated. And now I look back, the man is right in the light of the crowds, in the ice and snow in Alaska, so extraordinary resonance. Such a happiness! Kiss. If you can be more down-to-earth, with both spiritual resonance and material stability, it is perfect. Dear President Xi, 88, today you want me to talk about Africa and Europe. I watch Fudan University’s open class today, about the history of economics, people and their thoughts!  Like the last time I watch the history of philosophy, the more I listen to their source of thought, the more the mind is like taking a shower, it is so comfortable.  I don’t know why, since you brought me into politics, now look at these philosophical economies, the things that I feel are very interesting and meaningful. In fact, many times I talk about political economy, squandering, and extracting the main backbone theory, just as beautiful as a bony model. The things that are corrupted and dirty are actually the dust that came out during the running of the cleaning car! Anyway, when you see me talking nonsense in my essay with my eyes closed, please don't laugh at me! Talking about why China's commodity economy is not developing enough, Adam Smith commented on China, that the social division of labors was not enough. From ancient times to the Qing Dynasty, productivity in Chinese society had hardly changed much. The status of artisans was lower than that of farmers. Business was not encouraged. The economy could not be further developed; it was a problem of the economic system.  Because of Chinese culture, rich people did not use capital for investment, and there was no advancement in science and technology. They only bought land and adopted young concubine, were for the tertiary industry. It was China's cultural and economic system that limited China's development.