Aug 18, 2017 at 7:11 PM

亲爱的主席，88，只有从昨天开始，我才觉得你们是真正把我当作朋友的，愿意跟我在精神上，心有灵犀一点通进行交流的. 为什么? 因为只有从昨天开始，你们才给我实实在在的互动，我问你们问题，你们终于不再王顾左右而言他，不再虚无缥缈打太极，不再装模作样一问三不知，而是低眉顺目，礼贤下人，敞开心扉，吐露真言，让人惊鸿一瞥. 比如我请教你们,“中国文化中最精彩辉煌，有别于其他文化的地方是什么？” 你们不加思索就告诉我，“是中国的哲学思想”. 要知道中国的这些哲学思想都是政治方面的，尤其是儒学和中庸.  真棒！一言中的，三句话不离本行，中国改革开放的巨大成功完全脱离不了中国古代那么多优秀的政治哲学智慧！ 可为什么对我的短文评价才一两个字？ 可惜我不在你们身边，看不到你们，没法面对面对话. 如果可以，我会进一步问你们，那中西方的哲学思想最大的差别在什么地方？中国的哲学思想对社会政治有什么影响？如果你们要设立数字控制模型，怎么设立？ 那这些哲学思想又在哪些方面起到作用？今天我看山东大学的 “政治思想和政治智慧” 公开课程，战国诸子百家，孔子的儒家思想，商鞅的法家，和老子的无为之治. 于是我突发奇想，其实这都是一个政治统治模型的不同方面，儒家讲的是如何设立政治管理结构，老子的无为之治是在结构成熟完整的运行状态下，应该少做人为干预的原则，而法家的条条框框是在特别情况下，如初始建立结构时期，或者社会动荡情况下，乱世用重典或管理法则. 其实他们都在讲，在不同情况下，如何保持这个政治系统结构运行平稳，是不是？亲爱的主席，88，你看我是很会胡说八道信口开河的，而且是很有创意的，嘿嘿. 于是我更进一步想，贾谊的“过秦论”，讲的是因为秦国在建国以后，没有在数量上考虑周全国力对大规模国家发展计划的支撑能力，过度用权消耗国力而伤害民众的生活，才在民众的心理上造成逆反，而导致农民起义的. 孟子的思想，甚至董仲舒力排众议独崇儒的原因，是因为儒家的政治结构是所有这些政治哲学思想中对统治的的最合理最一般基础结构，所以才要崇儒的. 以后有人应该可以用科学的方法来阐述证明. 于是我就在想，那中国的文科生要有事做了，是不是可以设置很多项目，回顾历史，看看国顺民安日子，当时他们的管理政策手段是如何影响国家政治经济运行的？比如贞观之治，可惜那时候没有具体的数字记录. 应该深入历史去检视哪些时候，什么样的各种天灾人祸负面因素，到什么数量级，造成的社会动荡改朝换代？

Dear Chairman, 88, only from yesterday, I think you are really treating me as a friend, willing to communicate with me mentally and spiritually. Why? Because only from yesterday, you give me real interaction. When I ask you questions, you no longer turning around talking about something else, no longer do nothing about playing Tai Chi, no longer pretend to be indifferent and ask no questions, but lower your eyebrows, polite, open your heart, tell the truth, let me have a glimpse. For example, I asked you, "What is the most brilliant and splendid place in Chinese culture, what is different from other cultures?" You tell me without thinking, "It is the philosophy of Chinese". Know these things in China Philosophy is all political, especially Confucianism and the Golden Mean. Awesome! You talked about the purpose in one sentence, and you did not leave your industry in three sentences. The great success of China's reform and opening up cannot be separated from so many excellent political philosophical wisdom in ancient China! But why only one or two words to evaluate my essay? It's a pity that I'm not by your side, I can't see you, and I can't talk face to face. If I can, I will ask you further, what is the biggest difference between Chinese and Western philosophical thinking? What impact does Chinese philosophy have on social politics? If you want to set up a digital control model, how? In what ways do these philosophical ideas play a role? Today I watched the open course "Political Thinking and Political Wisdom" of Shandong University. There are hundreds of scholars in the Warring States Period, Confucianism in Confucius, Shang Yang ’s legalists, and Laozi ’s inaction. In different aspects of the political governance model, Confucianism is about how to set up a political management structure. Laozi's inaction rule is the principle that managers should do less human intervention in the operating state after the structure is mature and complete. The legalist framework is under special circumstances, such as the initial period of establishment of the structure, or in the case of social turmoil, the use of heavy codes in troubled times, or the rules of political management. In fact, they are all talking about how to maintain this political system structure in different situations. Running smoothly, isn't it? Dear Chairman, 88, you see that I am very nonsense and talk nonsense, and I am very creative, hehe. So I thought further, Scholar Jia Yi ’s "Qin's fault", because Qin State after the establishment of the country, Emperor Qin did not consider quantitatively about the ability of the national power to support the large-scale national development plan. His excessive use of power consumed the national power and hurt the lives of the people. Only then did the psychological rebellion of the people cause the peasant uprising. The reason why Mencius's thoughts, even Scholar Dong Zhongshuli's arrogance and advocacy of Confucianism, is because the political structure of Confucianism is the most reasonable and general basic structure of rule in all these political philosophical thoughts, so China must respect Confucianism. One point, someone should be able to explain the proof in a scientific way in the future. So I am thinking, that a large number of liberal arts students in China will have to do a lot of things in the future, can they set up a lot of projects, let them review the history, and look at the country. When the operation was smooth and the people were peaceful, how did the rulers' management policies and measures affect the country's political and economic operation? For example, the "Governance of Zhen Guan" in the Tang Dynasty, but unfortunately there may not be any specific digital records at that time. They should go into history to examine when, what kinds of negative factors of natural disasters and man-made disasters, to what order, and what kind of social unrest. And how this led to a change of dynasty?