美国后边的智库，为啥不能明智些将几千亿的军费用于和一带一路有关的投资，以及用高科技手段来发展和完善对全球各个方面的安全，生存，保护发展为目的的监控的网  The think tank behind the United States, why not be wise enough to invest hundreds of billions of troops in the investment related to the Belt and Road, and use high-tech methods to develop and improve the monitoring of the global security, survival, protection and development of all aspects network

 

美国的战略设计还是冷战思维  U.S. strategic designers still have Cold War thinking

世界向前进呢，美国的战略设计还是冷战思维，而且技术落后了，有很多方法和可能性可以让系统出错. 只要一个信号连接中断，就像眼睛瞎了一样. 花那么多代价功夫，顶着这么大的政治压力，得不偿失. 美国去建立的如此庞大的系统，维护又太费钱了. 韩国倒霉，被美国绑在战车上，跟两个大邻居中国和俄国作对，这中国还是他的最大的市场和经济来源. 于是韩国就好像承受两个巨大的板块相抨击，“地震”频繁，能量释放. 美国有点象前苏联，太过意识形态，也没有引领全球经济走向光明前景，这些年给了韩国很多好处，韩国在中国也是受益良多，毕竟日本，韩国是亚洲国家，而且一带一路前景辉煌诱人，就像以前冷战结束柏林墙倒塌，很多年前追随美国的，也推倒了新的柏林墙，比如菲律宾，要参与一带一路的世界潮流. 东北亚政治基础是东亚文化，载舟覆舟，朴槿惠一定下台. 萨德危矣，美国的战略谋划者应该认清国际现实，识相一点！虽然美国新增了540亿军费，也象以前用之不当打水漂，不但不能巩固美国在世界上的影响力，反而更加削弱国力. 美国后边的智库，为啥不能明智些将几千亿的军费用于和一带一路有关的投资，以及用高科技手段来发展和完善对全球各个方面的安全，生存，保护发展为目的的监控的网？是不是对人类的文明更有促进作用？我很多时候觉得，美国的战略家眼光狭隘，短视，只在美国自己，不能站在全球化的高度安天下. 是因为他们太强的，横向的，获取最大功益的，犹太文化吗？而中国提倡的一带一路，君临天下，有中央集权综合平衡统治的痕迹. 

 

The world is moving forward. The strategic design concept of the United States is still a Cold War mentality, and the technology is backward. There are many ways and possibilities to make the system wrong. As long as a signal connection is interrupted, it is like eyes blind. It took so much cost and effort, under such great political pressure, it was really not worth it. The United States has built such a huge system and it is too expensive to maintain it. South Korea is unlucky and tied to the chariot by the United States. It confronts two big neighbors, China and Russia, which is also its largest market and economic source. So South Korea seems to be under attack from two huge sectors, with frequent "earthquakes" and energy releases. The United States is a bit like the former Soviet Union. It is too ideological and has not led the global economy to a bright future. These years it has given South Korea a lot of benefits, and Korea has also benefited a lot in China. After all, Japan and South Korea are Asian countries, and the Belt and Road Initiative has a glorious and attractive prospect. Just as the Berlin Wall collapsed at the end of the Cold War, many American followers pushed down the new Berlin Wall, such as the Philippines, to participate in the world trend of the Belt and Road. The political foundation of Northeast Asia is East Asian culture. People can carry on and overthrow the boat, and Park Geun-hye must step down. THAAD is in danger. US strategic planners should recognize international realities and be more knowledgeable! Although the United States has increased its military expenditure by $ 54 billion, it has also been misused as before. Not only can it not consolidate the United States' influence in the world, but it has weakened its national strength. The think tank behind the United States, why not be wise enough to spend hundreds of billions of military expenditures for investment related to the Belt and Road Initiative, and the use of high-tech means to develop and improve the monitoring network for the safety, survival, protection and development of all aspects of the world? Does it promote human civilization more? I often feel that American strategists are narrow-minded and short-sighted. Only in the United States, they cannot stand in the height of Globalization. Is it because they are too powerful, horizontal, and most beneficial, Jewish culture? On the other hand, China advocates the Belt and Road Initiative, with monarchs presiding over the world, and traces of centralized and comprehensive centralized rule.