欧洲人应该为自己文化朝前发展和外来文化留一点空间  Europeans should leave a little room for the development of their own culture and foreign cultures

欧洲人比较排外，强烈维护自己的传统生活方式，对外来的人排挤, 冷漠, 不交流, 不怎么沟通. 好几个从欧洲到美国来的都这么告诉我，美国的文化，虽然有种族歧视，还是比较宽容的. 而欧洲人却视美国文化是原始低级的. 虽然欧洲各地有个性鲜明的文化，但是在接近自然的部分却越来越系统化和一体化. 我去年去欧洲，从西欧到北欧，污染控制，水土治理，景观建设却都一样，感觉到他们用的是一套标准. 文化是有生命力的，是需要不断有新的因素加进来，扬弃升华的. 从西欧到北欧，好像所有的角落都已经被满满的绿草茂密的植被填满了，几乎没有闲置空地. 觉得欧洲人应该为自己文化朝前发展留一点空间，让外来的文化和外来的人能有机会在这些空间里，为本土的的文化注入一些新元素，而且新文化在不同地区可以在这些空间里流转. 比如你做四百多种酒，可不可以不要那么多，但也做一点各种味道的酒酿？德国不要做那么多酸菜和面包，香肠，也产一点在中国那么流行的酱菜点心？或者烤肉？you never know, 不同文化之间的碰撞会产生什么新的东西？北欧人基本上都说英文，可是大多数法国人不说英文. 一个人在欧洲生存，要花这么多时间去学不同的语言，尤其是外来的人，有时觉得真是浪费青春. 语言是交流的工具，如果有一种工具，可以达意，我要学那么多语言干嘛？我觉得欧洲缺一种可以及时把各种语言翻译成听者理解语言的工具. 这是造成文化交流的大障碍呢. 欧洲是基督教国家，长达一千年的宗教控制黑暗中世纪，人们受宗教控制很深，意识形态上对非基督教的人群有排斥和敌意，以前派出一大批传教士也是为了扩展宗教势力，欧洲文明和市场，多次宗教战争也是为了争夺在意识形态上的控制权 .欧洲人应该退一步海阔天空，通过教育，更开放头脑，文化上更宽容，因为站在更高的位置看，很多事情，比如一带一路，文明发展，那是超越宗教文化的. 美国人现在对中国人的态度是强烈拥抱中国人的钱，拼命排斥中国人. 那是因为美国人在文化上不开放，受意识形态束缚，没有能力也无意愿接受中国人的丰富悠久文化. 欧洲人是不是对中国和其他文化也是这样态度的？我去看了他们的博物馆，觉得比美国人的要好很多，在地理上像欧洲大陆文化和亚洲文化是有很强的联系. 欧洲有许多的世界一流文化人才，在这次一带一路的大项目中，希望欧洲所能贡献的不光只是充裕的资金，还应该更能动地将各种人才参与具体的项目的设计和创建，那时候开出的绚烂文明之花，一定是非同凡响的. 其实你去看印度的美伦美奂建筑，虽然是清真寺，却有很强的罗马风格，精巧优美之处，青出于蓝更胜于蓝，Jackie都看得出，是比罗浮宫更fine art的. 欧洲人能够全方位参与这个项目，其实也是对自己现有的文化文明的一种促进和推动，就像父母有了孩子后，在跟孩子的互动中才真正让自己的人生完美成熟一样. 希望他们是这样的态度才好！ 我不知道你们对整个世界人类社会的构想是什么，是像美国那样, 变成一个能快速获取利润的homogeneous market, 还是有步骤地对发展中国家，先将其标准化统一并快速富裕起来，然后像中国这样乡镇个体化，还是一开始就把各地按欧洲模式个体化建设，对自然和基础建设按统一标准？看你们怎么优化设计了.

 

Europeans are more exclusive to foreigners and strongly maintain their traditional way of life. They are crowded out, indifferent, do not communicate well, do not communicate very much. Several people from Europe to the United States have told me so. Although there is racial discrimination in American culture, it ’s more tolerant. Europeans regard American culture as primitive and low-level. Although there are distinctive cultures all over Europe, they are becoming more and more systematic and integrated in the parts close to nature. I went to Europe last year, from Western Europe to Northern Europe, pollution control, water and soil management, and landscape construction are all the same. I feel that they are using a set of standards. When culture is alive, and new factors need to be added to sublimate it. From Western Europe to Northern Europe, it seems all the corners of lands have been filled with lush green grass and vegetation, and there is almost no empty space. I think Europeans should leave a little space for the development of their culture, so that foreign cultures and foreigners can have the opportunity to be in these spaces, inject some new elements into the local culture, and the new culture can flow in these spaces in different regions. For example, if you make more than 400 kinds of wine, can you not make so much, but also make a little sweet rice wine with various flavors? Can Germany not make so many sauerkraut, bread and sausages, but also make some thing like pickles and snacks  popular in China? Or barbecue? you never know, what's new coming up in the collision of different cultures! The Nordic people basically speak English, but most French people don’t speak English. To survive in Europe, it takes so much time to learn different languages, especially for foreigners, sometimes it feels like a waste of youth. Language is communication tools, if there is a tool that can achieve the purpose, why should you learn so many languages? I think Europe lacks a tool that can translate various languages ​​into the language that listeners understand. This is a major obstacle to cultural communication. Europe has Christianity, has a thousand-year-old religion controlled by the dark Ages, and people are subject to religious deep control, ideological exclusion and hostility to non-Christian populations. Previously, a large number of missionaries were also sent to expand religious power, European civilization and markets, and multiple religious wars to fight for ideological control. People should take a step back and open the sky. Through education, they are more open-minded and culturally more tolerant, because standing in a higher position, many things, such as the Belt and Road Initiative and the development of civilization, are beyond religious culture. Americans now on treating Chinese people, their attitude is to strongly embrace Chinese money and desperately reject Chinese people. That is because Americans are not culturally open, ideologically bound, incapable and unwilling to accept the rich and long-term Chinese culture. Are Europeans against Chinese and other cultures? I went to European museum and thought they are much better than the Americans’. Geographically, there is a strong connection between continental European culture and Asian culture. There are many world-class cultural talents in Europe. China hopes that Europe can contribute not only sufficient funds, but also more active participation of various talents in the design and creation of specific projects. The gorgeous flower of civilization developed at that time must be extraordinary. In fact, you see the wonderful and beautiful architecture in India. Although it is a mosque, it has a strong Roman style and exquisite beauty. Indigo is better than blue. Jackie can see that it is  finer art than what are  in the Louvre. Europeans being able to participate in this project in an all-round way is actually a promotion and promotion of their existing cultural civilization. Just like when parents have children, kids really make their life perfect and mature in the interaction with their children. Hope they have such an attitude! I don't know what your vision of human society as a whole is? Will it become a homogeneous market that can quickly make profits like the United States, or will it step by step standardize and unify the developing countries and make them rich quickly, and then individualize townships like China? Or do you start with individualized construction of each region according to the European model, and unified standards for nature and infrastructure? See how you optimize the design.