立即注册 登录
eNewsTree.com 返回首页

转折点的个人空间 http://enewstree.com/discuz/?12005 [收藏] [复制] [分享] [RSS]

日志

冷战是负面的

已有 57 次阅读2022-9-28 21:50 |个人分类:全球化

我们来看看历史吧。就个人而言,我认为马克思主义共产主义理论应该有自己的科学先进性。通过中央控制更好地利用地球有限资源,在一定条件下实现优化的经济效益。然而,西方资本主义更多地强调激励每个个人,并为他们提供更多的创造空间。它就像状态设置的两端,在哪里放置你的状态箭头,它应该取决于社会的生产力,所有的资源,文化等等。科学地说,系统运行能力的状态箭头可以是那些之间的任何位置。两个目的,比如说,北欧已经发展得很好,不仅仅是一个有补充的社会主义制度,不是完全社会主义,也不是资本主义。第二次世界大战后,意识形态冲突和权力斗争使人们忽视理性思维,当这些思想发生冲突时,历史故事就被扭曲了。冷战耗费了西方阵营和社会主义阵营的天文数字,人力,资源和时间,即使现在仍然以不同的形式进行着。  想到这一点,那与全球化背道而驰的巨大的能量,对整个世界人类社会来说,这是一种可怕的血腥负面障碍。

 

Let's take a look at history. Personally, I think that the Marxist theory of communism should have its own scientific advance. It is for better utilizing earth limited resources by central control to achieve optimized economic results under certain conditions. However the Western capitalism emphasized more on motivating each individual and providing them more space for creativity. It is like the two ends of the scale bar, Where to put your status arrow, it should depend on The societies’ production power, all resources, culture and Etc. Scientifically, the status arrow of system operation power can be any position between those two ends, say, North Europe has well developed well-fare that somehow is like a compensated socialism system, not completely socialism nor capitalism. After World War II, ideological conflicts and power struggle blind peoples’ eyes on rational thinking, When these became ideological conflicts, The history story has been twisted. The Cold War costs the Western camp and the socialist camp astronomical money, human labors, resources, and time, even now it is still going on in different forms. Thinking about that, that giant energy go against globalization, and what a terrible bloody cruel negative interference to the whole world human society. 


路过

鸡蛋

鲜花

握手

雷人

评论 (0 个评论)

facelist

您需要登录后才可以评论 登录 | 立即注册

小黑屋|Archiver|手机版|消息树

GMT-8, 2024-5-13 06:35 , Processed in 0.023599 second(s), 16 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

返回顶部