世界一体应该是把不同地区的生产力水平加以平衡，在此基础上，不同地方有自己的文化价值观. 文化发展可以多样性，  The integration of the world should balance the level of productivity in different regions. On this basis, different places have their own cultural values. Cultural development can be diverse.

Feb 19, 2018 at 8:43 PM

http://news.toutiaoabc.com/newspark/view.php?app=news&act=view&nid=285426

亲爱的习主席，88，谢谢你们对我昨天写的短文特别喜欢。哈哈哈 我并不是太了解你们，也不太了解那些世界领袖们，如果能够直接跟你们交流互动，多了解人的性格脾气背景和每个国家，那写出来一定是会非常生动的. T&B大权在握设置藩篱，现在我只能是全凭想象呀，在这边闭门造车发疯，请多包涵吧。昨天Steven问我要Jackie想见的候选人名单，可以是领袖也可以是精英。因为最近看见报道说，你们一带一路项目受阻. 还是一带一路的价值观受阻？于是就让Jackie向你们群里面问，谁愿意来洛杉矶看她. Steven一听赶快阻止 “不行，不行，不行，他们都想来....， 要有个选择。” 他们都想来呀，原来是这样子啊，不是那种想跟你们对着干的呀！其实任何大事情一个人做都不可能是十全十美的，如果有一个互补的当然很好。但是我觉得世界一体，还是应该有一个整体的统一的设计为好，在一个大的框架下，谁来做什么事情，那是可以商榷分工的。有两个设计就很可能产生冲突，incompatible,  很可能造成浪费，以后要花很多精力和代价来修补. 比如不同国家有不同的电压，不同的电插头。每个国家都生产它自己的电子器件，象经常旅游的人，如果去不同的国家的话，是不是一定要带各个国家的电插座，还有变压器呀？而有些电器不能用高压的，那该多麻烦呢！就是现在有了万能插座，你还是需要一个变换！如果一开始大家都没有定自己的规格，初始设计的时候就用统一的规格，就像欧亚非大陆用的metro system, 同一个标准到处适用，那才是好的设计呀！美日印澳这些国家是什么诉求呢？德国外长加布里尔在慕尼黑安全会议上说，中国利用“一带一路 ”宣扬违背民主、自由、人权的价值观“，看他们讲半天什么民主啊价值观啊，这跟那些基础设施建设标准又有嘛关系？西方世界这几百年来用他们的价值观统治世界，掠夺全世界， 哪有什么真正的民主自由人权呢？凭啥这世界就一定要永远受他们控制呢？依我认为，首先世界一体应该是把不同地区的生产力水平加以平衡，在此基础上，不同地方有自己的文化价值观. 就像人们可以选择信仰不同的宗教一样，文化发展可以多样性啊，但这跟文明的再平衡，不相违背的，用这个来为全球一体制造障碍，是毫无道理的。

Dear President Xi, 88, thank you for your special interest in the essay I wrote yesterday. Hahaha, I don’t know you too much, and I don’t know much about the world leaders either. If I can interact with you directly and learn more about the background of people’s temper and each country, it will be very vivid to write. T&B full of power makes barriers, now I can only rely on imagination, inside the closed door go crazy, please bear with it. Yesterday Steven asked me a list of candidates if I wanted Jackie to see, either a leader or an elite. Because I recently saw reports that your project has been blocked. Is the value of the Belt and Road all blocked? So let Jackie ask you in the group, who wants to come to Los Angeles to see her. Steven heard quickly stopped me, "No, no, no, they all want to come...., just select." They all want to come? it turned out to be the truth that it’s not they want to go against you! In fact, any big thing cannot be perfect done only by one person. If there is a complement, it is good. But I think that the world should be integrated. It should be better to have a unified design. In a big framework, whoever can do what, it is possible to discuss the division of labor. If there are two co-designs that are likely to cause conflicts, incompatible, which is likely to cause waste, and it will take a lot of effort and cost to make up in the future. For example, different countries have different voltages and different electrical plugs. Every country produces its own electronic devices. For people who travel frequently, if they go to different countries, do they have to bring the electrical outlets of various countries, as well as transformers? And some appliances can't use high voltage, so it's too much trouble! Now that you have a universal socket, you still need a change! If you don't have your own specifications at the beginning, the original design will use uniform specifications, just like the Euro system’s pan-continental metro system. The same standard is applicable everywhere, that is a good design! What are the demands of these countries in the US, Japan, and Australia? German Foreign Minister Gabriel said at the security conference in Munich that China uses the “Belt and Road” to go against the values of democracy, freedom and human rights. Look at what democracy and values they have for a long time, is this related to the standards of infrastructure construction? The Western world has used their values to rule the world and plunder the world for centuries. What is the real democracy, freedom and human rights? Why must the world be controlled by them forever.  In my opinion, first, the world should balance the productivity levels in different regions. On this basis, different places have their own cultural values. Just as people can choose to believe in different religions, cultural development can be diverse, but this is not contrary to the rebalancing of civilization. It is unreasonable to use this to create obstacles for the global integration.